Cloud, AI, and the GPU capacity behind them — one team, through delivery.

Three practices, deliberately connected: cloud services from migration to FinOps, AI systems built to survive production, and GPU capacity supplied and governed like infrastructure. We carry decisions from plan through to production.

  • Cloud migration & operations
  • AI systems & governance
  • FinOps & cost governance
  • GPU capacity & AI infrastructure
  • AWS Partner Network
  • Google Cloud Partner
  • Claude Partner Network — Anthropic

The practice

One cloud team. From plan to production.

Most teams don't need a consulting firm that hands over a slide deck and leaves. They need a cloud partner that understands both the engineering and the commercial picture — and can move between advisory and hands-on delivery without a vendor handoff.

CrossCloud is structured around that principle. We turn AWS complexity, constrained environments and opaque cloud spend into a sequenced plan, then stay engaged through execution. Strategy, delivery, operations, FinOps and wider technology decisions sit inside one team — so the people who recommend a direction are the ones who take it to production.

Specialisation

Certified team

Credentials spanning cloud, architecture, security, FinOps and enterprise technology — with AWS at the core and the broader ecosystem covered where it matters.

Integration

No handoffs

Advisory, delivery, FinOps and operations run through the same team, so decisions and execution stay connected.

Delivery

Outcome-led

Scope is shaped around commercial, technical and risk constraints — not a pre-packaged template.

Handover

Client-ownable

Engagements conclude with documented, operable environments the client's team can run independently.

What triggers a call

The recurring problems we are asked to solve.

AWS spend is growing faster than the business.

Monthly invoices are rising without a clear breakdown by product, team or environment — and no reliable forecast.

Typically addressed by FinOps diagnostic →
A migration has been planned, but the risk feels high.

The target architecture is unclear, the cutover sequence is untested, and nobody internally has done this at this scale before.

Typically addressed by Migration readiness assessment →
Production is stable, but fragile.

Incidents are handled heroically by a few engineers. Runbooks, monitoring and recovery procedures sit mostly in their heads.

Typically addressed by Operations readiness review →
The environment has grown, the governance has not.

Accounts, IAM, tagging and guardrails were set up for a smaller team and are no longer safe to keep scaling on.

Typically addressed by IAM & guardrails review →
An internal team needs reinforcement, not headcount.

Strong engineers, but no one with the scar tissue to make the high-stakes architecture, cost or operational calls with confidence.

Typically addressed by Retained technical partnership →
A previous vendor left the environment harder to own.

Undocumented changes, tangled Terraform, or a managed-service arrangement that now creates more drag than value.

Typically addressed by Environment & architecture review →
An AI pilot works in the demo but stalls before production.

There is no evaluation set reflecting real traffic, no regression testing when a prompt or model changes, and no way to trace a bad answer back to its cause.

Typically addressed by AI production readiness review →
A GPU commitment was signed before the workload was characterised.

A multi-year reservation paid for at a fraction of its utilisation — or frontier-tier silicon serving inference that a previous generation would handle at far lower cost per token.

Typically addressed by Capacity & commitment review →
GPU spend arrives as a single monthly figure.

No cost per training run, per model or per business owner — and with one provider, one region and one contract, no position to negotiate from when the renewal lands.

Typically addressed by GPU unit economics review →

Capabilities

Six capabilities, one team, no hand-offs.

Engagements take the form of focused advisory, defined delivery projects, or retained technical partnership — all anchored in AWS Well-Architected practice, and each with a defined starting point below.

Cloud & technology advisory

Independent guidance on cloud direction, architecture and the wider technology environment — anchored in AWS Well-Architected practice.

  • Cloud roadmap and architecture review
  • AWS Well-Architected alignment
  • Migration planning and readiness assessment
  • Wider technology and platform guidance

Start with an environment & architecture review

AWS migration & modernisation

Plan and run AWS migrations with a defined architectural target, reduced operational risk and a platform built for sustainable ownership.

  • Workload migration and replatforming
  • Landing zone design and implementation
  • Environment standardisation
  • Application and infrastructure modernisation

Start with a migration readiness assessment

FinOps & cost governance

Establish cost visibility, accountability and discipline across AWS environments — aligned to both engineering outcomes and financial controls.

  • Cost visibility and allocation
  • Rightsizing and commitment strategy
  • Savings Plans and Reserved Instance guidance
  • Spend governance, budgeting and forecasting

Start with a FinOps diagnostic

Operations & managed services

Keep production environments stable, performant and resilient through structured monitoring, incident response and maintenance practices — as a managed service, not ad-hoc support.

  • Operational monitoring and alerting
  • Incident response and escalation process
  • Backup and disaster recovery planning
  • Patching, tuning and ongoing support

Start with an operations readiness review

Security & governance

Strengthen the security and governance posture of AWS environments through practical controls, defined ownership and measurable improvement.

  • IAM and access design
  • Guardrails, policy and preventative controls
  • Environment review and remediation
  • Backup, recovery and resilience planning

Start with an IAM & guardrails review

DevOps & platform enablement

Build the engineering foundations — CI/CD, infrastructure as code and observability — so internal teams can deliver consistently and with confidence.

  • CI/CD and release engineering
  • Infrastructure as code (Terraform, AWS CDK)
  • Observability, logging and tracing
  • Developer workflow and tooling improvement

Start with a platform & tooling assessment

Not sure where to start?

Book a 30-min scoping call.

We'll listen to the immediate priority — migration, reliability, cost or capability — and suggest the smallest engagement that would move it forward.

Engagement

One rhythm. Four phases. Documented artefacts at every step.

Every engagement follows a defined pattern: understand the commercial context, assess the environment objectively, design a sequenced plan, and deliver alongside the client's team — leaving behind documented outputs the team can operate without us.

01
Discover

Establish the commercial objectives, stakeholders and operational context framing the decision.

Sample outputs

  • · Engagement brief and scope
  • · Stakeholder and decision map
  • · Success criteria
02
Assess

Review the environment, architecture and spend profile, producing actionable findings.

Sample outputs

  • · Environment and architecture assessment
  • · Spend profile and cost driver analysis
  • · Risk register and dependency map
03
Design

Translate findings into a sequenced plan, scoped to operating reality, delivery capacity and risk appetite.

Sample outputs

  • · Target architecture and reference diagrams
  • · Sequenced roadmap with effort and risk
  • · Architecture and cost decision log
04
Deliver

Execute alongside the client's team, transfer knowledge and hand over a durable, operable outcome.

Sample outputs

  • · Runbooks and incident playbooks
  • · Infrastructure-as-code repository
  • · Cost dashboards and review cadence

Every engagement concludes with a handover package the client's team can operate independently — retaining us is a choice, not a dependency.

Who runs CrossCloud

Three founders. One team. Senior judgement where it matters.

CrossCloud is led by three founders whose responsibilities cover the full span of a cloud engagement.
Deep engineering, Cross-disciplinary delivery, Commercial fit.
The people who recommend a direction are the ones who take it to production.

Advisory · Architecture · Operations

Senior cloud generalist

Multi-disciplinary depth across cloud architecture, operations, security and cost — the senior generalist who has sat at enough points of the stack to make the right tradeoffs when the answer isn't obvious. Stays close to delivery, so recommendations remain practical rather than theoretical.

Architecture review Operations Governance Delivery oversight

Engineering · Platform · Deep AWS

AWS Ambassador & principal engineer

An AWS Ambassador — a designation awarded to a limited community of engineers with demonstrated depth across the AWS service set and active technical contribution to the field. Covers architecture, platform engineering, security, observability and hands-on delivery. The person you want in the room when a decision has to be made against real engineering reality, not reference-architecture diagrams.

AWS Ambassador Platform engineering Well-Architected Modernisation

Commercial · Industry · Partnerships

Cloud business lead

Leads commercial engagement and sector-facing work. Years of enterprise AWS business development — understands how buyers in different industries actually procure, govern and adopt cloud, and how to translate technical capability into terms procurement, finance and executive stakeholders can sign off. Keeps engagements anchored to commercial outcomes, not just technical ones.

Enterprise sales Industry context Partner ecosystem Procurement

Three founders. One practice. Engagements stay close to the decisions being made — not routed through account layers.

Why us

Engineering depth without consulting overhead.

One team, from plan to production

The same people who shape the strategy run the delivery and operate the result — decisions and execution don't split across layers or vendors.

Pragmatic, not theoretical

Recommendations are shaped by the client's team, budget and operating reality — not lifted from a generic reference architecture.

FinOps as a design principle

Cost visibility and commercial discipline are built into how every AWS environment is designed, operated and reviewed — not treated as a separate workstream.

Engineered for handover

Engagements conclude with documented, operable environments the client's team can run — retaining us is a choice, not a dependency.

Frequently asked

Questions clients commonly raise before engaging.

Engagements generally fall into three categories: focused advisory (a specific review or plan), defined delivery projects (migrations, landing zones, FinOps uplift, platform work), and retained technical-partner engagements alongside the client's team. Where the appropriate shape is not yet clear, it is defined together during an initial consultation.

Yes. We regularly deliver for clients across multiple regions and time zones. Remote delivery, structured written communication and asynchronous collaboration are core to how the practice operates — not a compromise.

AWS is our primary area of specialisation and where we deliver the greatest value. We also advise on the broader technology environment — identity, networking, operations, vendor strategy and platform choices. Where a workload is better suited to another platform, that position is stated clearly.

FinOps engagements typically begin with a diagnostic covering spend profile, tagging, ownership and primary cost drivers. This produces a prioritised plan of improvements with estimated effort and commercial impact. Execution can then be run by the client's team, delivered jointly, or retained with CrossCloud. The objective is durable cost discipline, not a one-off optimisation.

An initial consultation is usually scheduled within a few business days. Short advisory engagements typically start within one to two weeks, subject to scope and access. Larger delivery engagements go through a formal scoping phase before any commitment is made.

Access follows least-privilege principles by default. It is scoped to the specific engagement, delivered through dedicated IAM roles where appropriate, and revoked on conclusion. Engagements align to the client's existing security policies and operate within their change-management and approval processes.

Large consulting firms typically separate advisory from delivery, and most managed service providers are optimised for run-state support rather than architecture and change. CrossCloud holds strategy, delivery, FinOps and operations inside one team — the same people who recommend a direction build and run it. Engagements are kept deliberately close to the environment and the decisions being made, rather than routed through account layers.

Yes. Most engagements sit alongside an internal team, and many involve other vendors. Boundaries of responsibility are defined clearly at the outset, work is done through the client's change-management and approval processes, and all artefacts are handed back in a form that internal engineers and other vendors can pick up without us.

Contact

Start with the environment you have today.

Whether you're planning a migration, reviewing cloud spend, or looking for an independent view on an existing environment — we're happy to have that conversation in confidence.

Response

Enquiries are typically acknowledged within 1 business day.

Prefer email? Write to info@crosscloud.com.au.